SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
----------------------
FORM 10-KSB
(Mark One)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(FEE REQUIRED)
For the Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 1998
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(NO FEE REQUIRED)
Commission File No. 001-13490
----------------------
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
TEXAS 76-0210849
(State of other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
44000 HIGHWAY 75 SOUTH
HUNTSVILLE, TEXAS 77340
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Issuer's telephone number: 409-291-2277
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
----------------------
NONE
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
COMMON STOCK, $.01 PAR VALUE
(TITLE OF CLASS)
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports,
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
--- ---
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item
405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definite proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form
10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB.
---
Issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year were $42,027,000.
As of May 11, 1998, there were outstanding 9,507,428 shares of the
registrant's common stock, par value $.01, which is the only class of common
or voting stock of the registrant. As of that date, the aggregate market
value of the shares of common stock or voting stock held by non-affiliates of
the registrant (based on the closing price for the common stock on the NASDAQ
National Market System on May 11, 1998) was approximately $113,082,937.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The information called for by Part III of this Form 10-KSB is
incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement for the 1998 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by
this report.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):
Yes No X
--- ---
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Item 1. Description of Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Item 2. Description of Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Item 3. Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders . . . . . . . . . . 12
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Item 6. Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan
of Operation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Item 7. Financial Statements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
PART III
Item 9. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters, and Control Persons;
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Item 10. Executive Compensation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. . . . . 16
Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions. . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Item 13. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND RISK FACTORS
Certain information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
(including statements contained in Part I, Item 1. "Description of Business"
and Item 3. "Legal Proceedings," and in Part II., Item 6. "Management's
Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation"), as well as other written and
oral statements made or incorporated by reference from time to time by the
Company and its representatives in other reports, filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, press releases, conferences, or otherwise, may be
deemed to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This information includes, without
limitation, statements concerning the Company's future financial position and
results of operations; planned capital expenditures; business strategy and
other plans for future operations; the future mix of revenues and business;
contingent liabilities; Year 2000 issues; and future demand and industry
conditions. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in
such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that
such expectations will prove to have been correct. When used in this report,
the words "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "may," and similar
expressions, as they relate to the Company and its management, identify
forward-looking statements. Factors which could affect the Company's actual
results and cause actual results to differ materially from those results
which might be anticipated, forecast or estimated by the Company in such
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
POSSIBLE ADVERSE EFFECT OF VOLATILITY OF OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY AND
DEMAND FOR SERVICES
Demand for the Company's services depends upon the level of spending by
oil and gas companies for exploration, production and development activities,
as well as on the number of crews conducting land and transition zone seismic
data acquisition worldwide, and especially in North America. Fluctuations in
the price of oil and gas in response to relatively minor changes in the
supply and demand for oil and gas continue to have a major effect on these
activities and thus, on the demand for the Company's services. Although
published industry sources indicate that the number of seismic crews has
decreased in the last five years, the Company believes that utilization of
3-D seismic equipment has increased. There can be no assurance that
utilization of 3-D seismic equipment will continue to increase, or of an
increased demand for additional 3-D seismic equipment or as to the level of
future demand for the Company's services.
DEPENDENCE UPON ADDITIONAL LEASE CONTRACTS
The Company's seismic equipment leases typically have a term of three to
nine months and provide gross revenues that recover only a portion of the
Company's capital investment. The Company's ability to generate lease
revenues and profits is dependent upon obtaining additional lease contracts
after the termination of an original lease. However, lessees are under no
obligation to, and frequently do not, continue to lease seismic equipment
after the expiration of a lease. Although the Company has been successful in
obtaining additional lease contracts with other lessees after the termination
of the original leases, there can be no assurance that it will continue to do
so. The Company's failure to obtain additional or extended leases beyond the
initial term would have a material adverse effect on its operations and
financial condition.
DEPENDENCE ON KEY PERSONNEL
The Company's success is dependent on, among other things, the services
of certain key personnel, including specifically Billy F. Mitcham, Jr., the
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
Mr. Mitcham's employment agreement has an initial term through January 15,
2002, and is automatically extended on a year-to-year basis until terminated
by either party giving 30 days notice prior to the end of the current term
(subject to earlier termination upon certain stated events). The agreement
prohibits Mr. Mitcham from engaging in any business activities that are
competitive with the Company's business and from diverting any of the
Company's customers to a competitor, for two years after the termination of
his employment. The Company has obtained a $1.0 million key employee life
insurance policy payable to the Company in the event of Mr. Mitcham's death.
The loss of the services of Mr. Mitcham could have material adverse effect on
the Company. In particular, the Exclusive Lease Referral Agreement with
Input/Output, Inc. (the "I/O Agreement") is terminable at such time as Mr.
Mitcham is no longer the President of the Company and the Exclusive Equipment
Lease Agreement with Sercel
1
is terminable at such time as he is no longer employed by the Company in a
senior management capacity.
CUSTOMER CONCENTRATION AND CREDIT LOSSES; INDUSTRY CONSOLIDATION
The Company typically leases and sells significant amounts of seismic
equipment to a relatively small number of customers, the composition of which
changes from year to year as leases are initiated and concluded and
customers' equipment needs vary. Therefore, at any one time, a large portion
of the Company's revenues may be derived from a limited number of customers,
and its ability to maintain profitability includes risks associated with the
creditworthiness and profitability of those customers. In the fiscal years
ended January 31, 1996, 1997 and 1998, the single largest customer accounted
for approximately 18%, 15% and 20%, respectively, of the Company's total
revenues. The termination of any large seismic lease could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's operations if the Company does not replace
such business on a timely basis. In addition, because the Company's
customer base is relatively small, the trend toward consolidation in the oil
and gas industry could adversely affect the Company's business and financial
condition if significant customers are acquired by other companies.
TECHNOLOGICAL OBSOLESCENCE
The Company has a substantial capital investment in seismic data
acquisition equipment. In addition, under the I/O Agreement, the Company is
required to make an additional investment in seismic and other peripheral
equipment. The Company believes that the technology represented by the
equipment in service and that which it is required to purchase from I/O will
not become obsolete prior to the Company's recovery of its initial
investment. However, there can be no assurance that manufacturers of seismic
equipment will not develop alternative systems that would have competitive
advantages over seismic systems now in use, thus having a potentially adverse
effect on the Company's ability to profitably lease its existing seismic
equipment. In the past, the Company has been successful in avoiding material
losses caused by technological obsolescence by selling its older seismic
equipment to seismic contractors and other parties. However, there can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to sell its older seismic equipment
in the future.
VULNERABILITY TO WEATHER CONDITIONS AND SEASONAL RESULTS
The first and fourth quarters of the Company's fiscal year have
historically accounted for and are expected to continue to account for a
greater portion of the Company's revenues than do the second and third
quarters of its fiscal year. This seasonality in revenues is primarily due
to the increased seismic survey activity in Canada from October through
March, which affects the Company due to its significant Canadian operations.
This seasonal pattern may cause the Company's results of operations to vary
significantly from quarter to quarter. Accordingly, period to period
comparisons are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied on as
indicative of future results.
DEPENDENCE UPON KEY SUPPLIERS
The Company has and relies upon agreements with I/O, Sercel, Pelton, a
manufacturer and supplier of vibrator control electronics, and StrucTec
Systems, L.L.C. ("StrucTec"), a manufacturer of replacement battery packs and
battery chargers, to purchase seismic equipment that the Company leases and
sells to its customers and, to a lesser extent, to receive lease referrals.
The termination of these agreements for any reason, including any failure by
the Company to meet the minimum purchase requirements under the I/O
Agreement, could materially adversely affect the Company's business. While
the Company does not anticipate any difficulty in obtaining seismic equipment
from its suppliers based upon past experience, any such occurrence could have
a material adverse effect upon the Company's business, financial condition
and results of operations.
COMPETITION
Competition in the leasing of seismic equipment is fragmented, and the
Company is aware of several companies that engage in seismic equipment
leasing. The Company believes that its competitors, in general, do not have
as extensive a seismic equipment lease pool as does the Company. The Company
also believes that its competitors do not have similar exclusive lease
referral agreements with suppliers. Competition exists to a lesser extent
from seismic data acquisition firms that may lease equipment that is
temporarily idle. Under the I/O Agreement, I/O and its subsidiary, Global
Charter
2
Corporation ('Global") retain the right to continue to (i) lease channel
boxes in certain situations where the Company and a prospective lessee cannot
or do not enter into a lease, as more fully described in the I/O Agreement,
(ii) lease channel boxes with a purchase option in North and South America
and (iii) lease channel boxes outside of North and South America.
The Company has several competitors engaged in seismic equipment leasing
and sales, including seismic equipment manufacturers, companies providing
seismic surveys and oil and gas exploration companies that use seismic
equipment, many of which have substantially greater financial resources than
the Company. There are also several smaller competitors who, in the
aggregate, generate significant revenue from the sale of seismic survey
equipment.
NO ANTICIPATED DIVIDENDS
The Company has never paid cash dividends on its Common Stock and does
not presently anticipate paying any cash dividends on the Common Stock in the
foreseeable future. In addition, the loan agreement between the Company and
its commercial lender restricts the payment of dividends.
POSSIBLE ADVERSE EFFECT OF ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS; ISSUANCE OF PREFERRED
STOCK
Certain provisions of the Company's Articles of Incorporation and the
Texas Business Corporation Act may tend to delay, defer or prevent a
potential unsolicited offer or takeover attempt that is not approved by the
Board of Directors that the Company's shareholders might consider to be in
their best interest, including an attempt that might result in shareholders
receiving a premium over the market price for their shares. Because the
Board of Directors is authorized to issue preferred stock with such
preferences and rights as it determines, it may afford the holders of any
series of preferred stock preferences, rights or voting powers superior to
those of the holders of Common Stock. Although the Company has no shares of
preferred stock outstanding and no present intention to issue any shares of
its preferred stock, there can be no assurance that the Company will not do
so in the future.
LIMITATION ON DIRECTORS' LIABILITY
The Company's Articles of Incorporation provide, as permitted by
governing Texas law, that a director of the Company shall not be personally
liable to the Company or its shareholders for monetary damages for breach of
fiduciary duty as a director, with certain exceptions. These provisions may
discourage shareholders from bringing suit against a director for breach of
fiduciary duty and may reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation brought
by shareholders on behalf of the Company against a director.
PART I
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
BACKGROUND
Mitcham Industries, Inc. leases and sells geophysical and other
equipment used primarily by seismic service companies in performing seismic
data acquisition surveys on land and in transition zones (marsh and shallow
water areas). The Company conducts its operations on a worldwide basis and is
a leading independent seismic equipment lessor in North and South America.
Demand for seismic services has increased significantly in the past several
years due to advances in technology and the impact such advances have had on
increasing drilling success rates, thereby reducing the overall costs of
finding oil and gas. As a result, the Company and many seismic contractors
have significantly expanded their seismic equipment fleets. From January 31,
1994 through January 31, 1998, the Company's equipment lease pool, at cost,
increased from approximately $957,000 to $49.9 million, and the number of
advanced seismic data acquisition recording channels in the equipment lease
pool increased from 510 channels to 17,920 channels. The Company's sales of
new and used seismic equipment have also increased significantly.
The Company owns a variety of technologically advanced equipment
acquired from the leading seismic manufacturers.
3
The Company's lease pool includes many types of equipment used in seismic
data acquisition, including all components of land and transition zone
seismic data acquisition systems, geophones and cables, earth vibrators,
peripheral equipment and survey and other equipment. A substantial portion of
the Company's lease equipment is provided by two manufacturers, Input/Output,
Inc. ("I/O") and the Sercel subsidiaries of Compagnie Generale de Geophysique
("Sercel"). The Company believes that most of the advanced seismic data
acquisition systems in use worldwide are either I/O or Sercel systems. In the
last two years, the Company has significantly diversified its equipment lease
pool. At January 31, 1998, approximately 52% of the Company's equipment lease
pool, on a cost basis, consisted of advanced digital recording channels, with
the remainder consisting of peripheral and other equipment.
The Company leases its equipment on a short-term basis, generally for
three to nine months, to seismic contractors who need additional capacity to
complete a seismic survey. In doing so, the Company enables its customers to
achieve operating and capital investment efficiencies. Demand for short-term
seismic equipment leases is affected by many factors including: (i) the
highly variable size and technological demands of individual seismic surveys,
(ii) seasonal weather patterns and sporadic demand for seismic services in
certain regions, (iii) rapidly changing technology and (iv) costs of seismic
equipment. The Company believes these factors allow seismic contractors to
use short-term seismic equipment leasing as a cost-effective alternative to
purchasing additional equipment. The Company's equipment lease rates vary
according to an item's expected useful life, utilization and initial cost.
For example, monthly lease rates for seismic recording channel boxes
typically range between 6% and 8% of the original cost of the equipment.
A typical seismic crew uses a wide variety of equipment to perform
seismic data acquisition surveys. The Company's customers may lease a small
amount of equipment to expand an existing crew's capabilities or a complete
seismic data acquisition system to equip an entire crew. The Company believes
that it achieves high utilization of its equipment and operational
efficiencies due to the large number of equipment items it has available for
lease, which provides the flexibility to meet customers' needs. The Company's
lease pool utilization for the year ended January 31, 1998 was approximately
65%. Due to the varying operating conditions created by seasonal weather
patterns, the Company estimates its maximum lease pool utilization is
approximately 75-80%.
Certain of the Company's leases contain a purchase option, allowing the
customer to apply a portion of the lease payments to the eventual purchase of
the equipment. Additionally, the Company sells a broad range of used seismic
equipment on a worldwide basis and, in certain markets, acts as a sales
representative or distributor for new seismic equipment.
The Company has supply and exclusive lease referral agreements with
several leading seismic equipment manufacturers including I/O, Sercel and
Pelton. The Company believes that these agreements provide it with a
significant competitive advantage. Under these agreements, the Company is the
exclusive worldwide short-term leasing representative for certain products,
except in the case of the I/O Agreement, which limits the Company's
exclusivity to the Western Hemisphere. Additional agreements exist with
certain of these manufacturers allowing the Company to act as sales
representative or distributor for such manufacturer's products in selected
markets. These agreements have varying terms and expire in 1998 through 2000,
subject to modification or extension.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
The Company's business strategy is to meet the expanding needs of users
of seismic equipment through its leasing and support services. To accomplish
this, the Company has identified the following major objectives:
- ENLARGE AND DIVERSIFY THE SEISMIC EQUIPMENT LEASE POOL. Due to the
increasing demand for seismic services and the expanding size and
variability of seismic surveys, the Company intends to continue to
increase the size and diversity of its equipment lease pool. The
Company believes that the availability of a larger and more diverse
seismic equipment lease pool will encourage seismic survey companies
to lease, rather than purchase, such equipment, due to the capital and
operating efficiencies provided by short-term leases. The Company is
also evaluating the feasibility of broadening its equipment lease pool
to include certain marine seismic equipment.
- EXPAND INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS. Historically, the Company's
activities outside North America have consisted of equipment sales,
with a limited amount of leasing activities. In fiscal 1998, the
Company's leasing activities in South America and other international
locations have increased significantly. The Company believes that it
will be able to
4
expand its international leasing activities as its equipment lease
pool expands and as its customers' operations continue to grow in
international markets. The Company receives referrals from Sercel
and other manufacturers on a worldwide basis. The Company believes
that its alliances with manufacturers will help it to further
penetrate international markets, where such manufacturers are
well-recognized and have well-developed business relationships.
- DEVELOP AND ENHANCE ALLIANCES WITH MAJOR SEISMIC EQUIPMENT
MANUFACTURERS. The Company's alliances with leading seismic equipment
manufacturers such as I/O and Sercel allow it to expand its equipment
lease pool on favorable terms and increase customer referrals. The
Company believes such alliances improve its relations with customers
and provide a significant competitive advantage. The Company has
exclusive short-term lease agreements with four manufacturers and is
seeking to expand the scope of existing alliances, as well as develop
additional arrangements.
- PURSUE ADDITIONAL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES. The Company
regularly evaluates opportunities to expand its business activities
within the oil service industry, particularly in the seismic sector.
For example, the Company is evaluating a joint venture with a seismic
acquisition company and a seismic data processing company to pursue
multi-client seismic activities in selected areas of North America.
Multi-client seismic data would be acquired and owned by the joint
venture and marketed to numerous oil and gas companies for use in
their exploration and production operations.
SEISMIC TECHNOLOGY AND THE INDUSTRY
Seismic surveys are a principal source of information used by oil and
gas companies to identify geological conditions that are favorable for the
accumulation of oil and gas and to evaluate the potential for successful
drilling, development and production of oil and gas. Seismic technology has
been used by the oil and gas industry since the 1920's and has advanced
significantly with improvements in computing and electronic technologies. In
recent years, the oil and gas industry has significantly expanded its use of
3-D seismic which provides a more comprehensive subsurface image and is
believed to have contributed to improved drilling success rates, particularly
in mature oil and gas basins such as those in North America. Additionally,
2-D seismic data continues to be used in many areas where 3-D data
acquisition is cost prohibitive or logistical access is limited.
Oil and gas exploration companies utilize seismic data generated from
the use of digital seismic systems and peripheral equipment in determining
optimal locations for drilling oil and gas wells, in the development of oil
and gas reserves, and in reservoir management for the production of oil and
gas. A complete digital seismic data acquisition system generally consists of
(i) a central electronics unit that records and stores digital data ("CEU"),
(ii) seismic recording channel boxes that contain from one to six seismic
channels ("channel boxes"), (iii) geophones, or seismic sensors, (iv) energy
sources including dynamite, compressed air guns or earth vibrators that
create the necessary acoustic wave to be recorded and (v) other peripheral,
or accessory, equipment. Peripheral equipment includes geophysical cables
that transmit digital seismic data from the channel boxes to the CEU, survey
equipment, drilling equipment for shot holes and other equipment.
In seismic data acquisition, an acoustic wave is discharged at or below
the earth's surface through the discharge of compressed air, the detonation
of small explosive charges or the use of vibrators. As the acoustic wave
travels through the earth, portions are reflected by variations in the
underlying rock layers and the reflected energy is captured by the geophones,
which are situated at intervals along paths from the point of acoustical
impulse. The resulting signals are then transmitted to the channel boxes,
which convert the reflected energy wave from analog to digital data and
transmit this data via cable to the CEU. The CEU stores the seismic data on
magnetic tape for processing. The digital data is then input into a
specialized seismic processing system that uses sophisticated computer
software programs to enhance the recorded signal and produce an image of the
subsurface strata. By interpreting seismic data, oil and gas exploration
companies create detailed maps of exploration prospects and oil and gas
reservoirs.
In the past, the 2-D seismic survey was the standard data acquisition
technique used to describe geologic formations over a broad area. 2-D seismic
data can be visualized as a single vertical plane of subsurface information.
Data gathered from a 3-D seismic survey is best visualized as a cube of
information that can be sliced into numerous planes, providing different
views of a geologic structure with much higher resolution than is available
with traditional 2-D seismic survey techniques. 3-D seismic surveys require
much larger data acquisition systems. By using a greater number of channels
and flexible configuration, 3-D seismic data provides more extensive and
detailed information regarding the subsurface geology than does
5
2-D data. As a result, 3-D data allows the geophysicists interpreting the
data to more closely select the optimal location of a prospective drillsite
or oil and gas reservoir.
In the exploration and development process, oil and gas companies
establish requirements for seismic data acquisition programs based on their
technical objectives. Because of the expense associated with drilling oil and
gas wells, decisions whether or where to drill are critical to the overall
process. Because 3-D seismic data increase drilling success rates and reduce
costs, the Company believes that oil and gas companies are increasingly
requiring 3-D seismic surveys in their activities. As a result of the
increasing requirements for this higher resolution data, which in turn
requires additional channels to collect and transmit the data, seismic data
acquisition systems have been expanding in size during the past several years.
Recent industry advances include the use of high resolution 2-D,
three-component geophones ("3C-3D"), which enhance the 3-D image, and time
lapse ("4-D") seismic, where surveys are periodically reacquired to allow the
monitoring of a producing oil and gas field for optimal production and
reserve recovery. These and other technical advances have contributed to
increased drilling success rates and reduced oil and gas finding costs and
consequently, have increased demand for seismic data acquisition equipment
and services.
With the expanded use of seismic technology, particularly 3-D seismic,
the size of data acquisition surveys has increased substantially in the past
several years. Demand for higher resolution data, larger surveys and more
rapid completion of such surveys is requiring seismic acquisition companies
to use data acquisition systems with a greater number of seismic recording
channels. Additionally, in many areas, such as North America, the size of
seismic surveys varies significantly, requiring frequent changes in the
configuration of equipment and crews used for seismic surveys. As a result of
these advances, seismic survey channel count has increased from smaller 2-D
surveys, which typically averaged 120 channels, to larger 3-D surveys which
today average approximately 1,500 channels and often use 3,000 or more
channels. The Company believes that many seismic service companies will
continue to meet changes in equipment needs by leasing incremental equipment
to expand crew size as necessary to meet specific survey requirements, and
thereby reduce the substantial capital expenditures necessary to purchase
such equipment.
BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS
SEISMIC EQUIPMENT LEASING. The Company typically purchases new and used
seismic equipment for short-term (less than one year) lease to its customers,
which primarily include seismic service companies. After the termination of
the original equipment lease, the Company enters into additional short-term
leases with other customers, often leasing such equipment multiple times
until the end of its useful life or its sale. The Company's equipment leasing
services generally include the lease of the various components of seismic
data acquisition systems and related equipment to meet a customer's job
specifications. Such specifications frequently vary as to the number of
required recording channels, geophones, energy sources (e.g., earth
vibrators) and other equipment. The Company's customers generally lease
seismic equipment to meet shortages of recording channels and related
equipment for specific surveys. Typically, the Company does not lease all of
the channel boxes and other peripheral equipment required for seismic
surveys, although it has the capability to lease equipment for an entire
seismic system and, from time to time, will do so.
The Company currently has an equipment lease pool comprising a total of
approximately 17,920 seismic recording channels (each channel being capable
of electronically converting seismic data from analog to digital format and
transmitting the digital data), geophones and cables, earth vibrators,
peripheral equipment and survey and other equipment. All of the Company's
lease pool equipment is manufactured by leading seismic equipment
manufacturers and is widely used in the seismic industry.
The Company's equipment leases generally have terms of three to nine
months and are typically renewable on a month-to-month basis. The Company
offers maintenance of its leased equipment during the lease term for
malfunctions due to failure of material and parts and will provide
replacement equipment as necessary. In addition, the Company provides
telephone support services to answer its lease customers' questions.
The Company's equipment lease rates vary according to an item's expected
useful life, utilization and initial cost. For example, monthly lease rates
for seismic recording channel boxes typically range between 6% and 8% of the
original cost of the equipment. Lease payments are due and payable on the
first day of each month of the lease term. The lessee must also
6
obtain and keep in force insurance for the replacement value of the equipment
and a specified minimum amount of general liability and casualty insurance on
the leased equipment during the term of the lease. Before equipment is
delivered, the lessee must provide certification that the Company has been
named an additional insured and loss payee on its policies. The lessee is
responsible for all maintenance and repairs of leased equipment other than
those arising from normal wear and tear. All taxes (other than U.S. federal
income taxes) and assessments are the contractual obligation of the lessee.
To the extent foreign taxes are not paid by the lessee, the relevant foreign
taxing authority might seek to collect such taxes from the Company. To date,
no such collection action has been taken against the Company.
A majority of the Company's leasing revenues have historically come from
North American operations. Within North America, a significant portion of the
Company's total revenues are attributable to Canadian operations. Management
believes that the United States and Canada will continue to be the focal
points of the Company's seismic equipment leasing operations for the
foreseeable future, although the Company is pursuing an expanded presence in
other international locations such as South America and the Far East.
Historically, seismic equipment leasing has been susceptible to weather
patterns in certain geographic regions. There is some seasonality to the
Company's lease operations in Canada, where a significant percentage of the
seismic survey activity usually occurs in the winter season, from October
through March. During the months in which the weather is warmer, certain
areas are not accessible to trucks, earth vibrators and other heavy equipment
because of the unstable terrain. In the United States, most of the seismic
survey work is not usually affected by weather. As a result of weather
conditions, the Company attempts to manage its equipment lease pool to meet
seasonal demands. Equipment leased in Canada during the winter months may be
moved to the United States in the warmer months.
SEISMIC EQUIPMENT SALES. The Company's equipment sales business serves a
diverse base of industry, governmental, university and research customers.
The Company typically buys used equipment for resale and new equipment in
response to specific customer orders. On occasion, the Company will also hold
equipment of third parties and sell such equipment on consignment.
SEISMIC EQUIPMENT LEASE/PURCHASES. The Company's lease/purchase
activities reflect the two components involved in lease/purchase option
contracts. The lease revenue component represents the lease amounts paid
under the lease/purchase contracts and the sales component represents the
sales revenue and related cost associated with the customers' exercise of the
purchase option.
SEISMIC EQUIPMENT COMMISSIONED SALES. Under the Sercel Sales Agreement
dscussed below, the Company receives sales commissions on all Sercel
equipment and spare parts sold in Canada.
KEY SUPPLIER AGREEMENTS
THE I/O AGREEMENT
Under the I/O Agreement, which was originally entered into in February
1994, the Company is the exclusive third-party recipient of requests from I/O
customers and others to lease, on a short-term basis, channel boxes and
certain peripheral equipment in North and South America through May 31, 2000.
The Company may also acquire certain equipment from I/O at favorable prices
based upon the volume of channel boxes purchased. Subject to certain
exceptions, I/O may not recommend or suggest any competitor of the Company as
a potential lessor of I/O channel boxes in North and South America. As a
manufacturer of complete data acquisition systems that are compatible only
with I/O channel boxes, I/O typically receives inquiries to lease I/O channel
boxes from customers desiring to expand the capacities of their systems on a
short-term basis.
A condition of the I/O Agreement is that the Company must purchase an
aggregate of $13.25 million of I/O 3-D channel boxes on or before May 31,
2000 in the following stated installments: (i) by November 30, 1996, at least
$3.0 million, (ii) from January 1, 1997 through May 31, 1997, at least $1.25
million and (iii) in each of the years from June 1, 1997 through May 31,
1998, June 1 through May 31, 1999, and June 1, 1999 through May 31, 2000, at
least $3.0 million. As of January 31, 1998, the Company had purchased I/O
equipment totaling over $13.25 million under the I/O Agreement, thereby
exceeding its purchase requirements under this agreement.
7
Under the I/O Agreement, I/O must inform the Company by telephone,
facsimile or letter of the identity of the third party prospective lessee and
the terms, if any, that have been discussed regarding a proposed lease. The
Company may then contact the prospective lessee and negotiate the terms of a
proposed lease of channel boxes. If the Company (i) is unable to lease the
channel boxes due to a shortage in its lease fleet, (ii) cannot agree with a
prospective lessee on the terms of a proposed lease within 72 hours of the
lessee's introduction to the Company or (iii) otherwise chooses not to lease
to a prospective lessee, then I/O may lease channel boxes to the prospective
lessee. I/O has indicated that the 72-hour time period may be extended as long
as the Company and a prospective lessee are engaged in good faith negotiations
and neither of them has terminated such negotiations.
Leases of channel boxes with purchase options are specifically excluded
from the I/O Agreement. Therefore, I/O may continue to enter into leases with
purchase options in North and South America during the term of the I/O
Agreement. I/O may also continue to sell channel boxes during the term of the
I/O Agreement.
The Company primarily purchases new channel boxes from I/O, but from time
to time purchases channel boxes from I/O's existing lease fleet. All of the
new channel boxes purchased from I/O have a warranty which covers, with
certain exceptions, defects in workmanship for six months and defects in
materials and parts for 12 months. Used channel boxes acquired from I/O's
existing lease fleet will be refurbished by I/O and have a warranty which
covers, with certain exceptions, defects in workmanship for three months.
The I/O Agreement is subject to termination by I/O upon the occurrence of
(i) the Company's failure to comply with the terms of the I/O Agreement after
having received written notice of its non-compliance, (ii) the Company's
discontinuance as a going concern, (iii) the Company's default in the payment
of any obligations to I/O after having received notice that payment is due,
(iv) the Company's insolvency or bankruptcy, (v) Billy F. Mitcham, Jr. no
longer owning at least 250,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company, (vi)
Billy F. Mitcham, Jr. no longer remaining as the President of the Company,
(vii) any transfer of the I/O agreement by merger, consolidation, or
liquidation or (viii) the Company's assignment, or attempted assignment of its
rights under the agreement.
THE SERCEL LEASE AGREEMENT
In September 1996, the Company entered into the Exclusive Equipment Lease
Agreement with Sercel (the "Sercel Lease Agreement"), under which the Company
acts as Sercel's exclusive worldwide short-term leasing representative and
Sercel must refer to the Company all requests it receives (other than requests
from its affiliates) to lease its 3-D data acquisition equipment and other field
equipment, through December 31, 1999. Subject to the exceptions discussed below,
Sercel may not recommend or suggest any competitor of the Company as a potential
lessor of such data acquisition equipment. In addition, the Company may not
engage in financing leases and leases for a duration of more than one year.
A condition of the Sercel Lease Agreement is that the Company purchase an
aggregate of $10.2 million of Sercel data acquisition and other field equipment
on or before December 31, 1999. At January 31, 1998, the Company had exceeded
its purchase requirements under the Sercel Lease Agreement.
Sercel must inform the Company of the identity of the third party
prospective lessee and the terms, if any, that have been discussed regarding a
proposed lease. If the Company either (i) is unable to lease the Sercel
equipment due to a shortage in its lease fleet, (ii) cannot agree with a
prospective lessee on the terms of a proposed lease within five business days
of the lessee's introduction to the Company or (iii) otherwise chooses not to
lease to a prospective lessee, then Sercel may lease its equipment to the
prospective lessee.
The agreement is subject to termination by Sercel (i) at any time upon (a)
Sercel's reasonable belief that the Company has violated or intends to violate
the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, (b) the Company's refusal
or inability to certify that it is in compliance with laws applicable to its
activities or (c) the Company's insolvency, voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy,
assignment for the benefit of creditors or discontinuance as a going concern and
(ii) upon 90 days prior written notice if the Company no longer employs Billy F.
Mitcham, Jr. in a senior management capacity.
THE SERCEL SALES AGREEMENT
8
Through Mitcham Canada Ltd., the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary formed
in September 1996, the Company entered into the Commercial Representation
Agreement (the "Sercel Sales Agreement") with Georex, Inc. ("Georex"), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Sercel, under which the Company is Sercel's
designated sales representative in Canada for its data acquisition and other
field equipment through September 19, 1999, subject to earlier termination
after September 20, 1998, on 90 days prior notice. If not sooner terminated,
the agreement will automatically be extended for successive one-year periods
after September 19, 1999. Under the agreement, the Company is entitled to
receive a commission on all Sercel equipment and spare parts sold in Canada.
In November 1996, in connection with the Sercel Sales Agreement and the
Sercel Lease Agreement, the Company established an office in Calgary, Alberta,
Canada to sell, service and lease Sercel equipment and to lease and service
equipment of other manufacturers. The Company is prohibited from selling
certain seismic equipment that competes with Sercel equipment during the term
of the agreement and for six months thereafter, except that the Company may
sell individual components that compete with components of Sercel equipment,
such as I/O channel boxes and Pelton vibrator control electronics, as well as
any seismic equipment previously used in its lease fleet.
The Sercel Sales Agreement is subject to termination by Georex upon (i)
Georex's reasonable belief that the Company has violated or intends to violate
the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, (ii) the Company's
refusal or inability to certify that it is in compliance with laws applicable
to its activities or (iii) the Company's insolvency, voluntary or involuntary
bankruptcy, assignment for the benefit of creditors or discontinuance as a
going concern.
OTHER AGREEMENTS
In May 1996, the Company entered into an exclusive lease referral
agreement (the "Pelton Agreement") with Pelton. The Company believes Pelton is
the leading manufacturer and supplier of vibrator control electronics. The
terms of the Pelton Agreement regarding exclusive lease referrals and
favorable prices are substantially similar to those of the I/O Agreement,
except that the Company has the exclusive referral rights with respect to
Pelton's vibrator control electronics worldwide, through December 31, 1998.
Thereafter, such agreement is automatically extended until terminated by
either party upon three months prior written notice.
In October 1997, the Company entered into the Exclusive Lease
Representative and Distributor Agreement with StrucTec (the "StrucTec
Agreement"), which manufactures and distributes replacement batteries and
battery packs for seismic data acquisition equipment of several manufacturers.
Under the StrucTec Agreement, through October 29, 1999, the Company is the
exclusive worldwide short-term leasing representative and distributor of
replacement batteries, battery packs and certain other peripheral equipment
manufactured by StrucTec. The Company is also the exclusive worldwide
distributor of StrucTec products, except that StrucTec may continue to sell
its products to seismic equipment manufacturers.
The Company is also engaged in discussions with other seismic equipment
manufacturers regarding terms pursuant to which the Company would act as an
exclusive lease or sales representative with respect to their equipment.
CUSTOMERS; SALES AND MARKETING
The Company's major lease customers are seismic data acquisition
companies and major and independent oil and gas companies. The Company
typically has a small number of lease customers, the composition of which
changes yearly as leases are negotiated and concluded and equipment needs
vary. As of January 31, 1998, the Company had 37 lease customers with active
leases of various lengths. Customers of the Company's used and new seismic
equipment sales and service business include its lease customers, foreign
governments, universities, engineering firms and research organizations
worldwide.
The Company participates in both domestic and international trade shows
and expositions to inform the oil and gas industry of its products and
services. In addition to advertising in major geophysical trade journals,
direct advertising in the form of a biannual listing of equipment offerings is
mailed to over 3,000 oil and gas industry participants. The Company believes
this mailing generates significant seismic equipment lease and sales revenues.
In addition, the Company advertises its alliances with each of I/O, Sercel and
Pelton in several major geophysical trade journals. The Company also maintains
a web site on which it lists its seismic equipment for sale and lease.
9
The Company works with a network of representatives in several
international markets, including Europe, the Far East and the Commonwealth of
Independent States. These agents generate equipment sales and, to a lesser
extent, equipment leasing business for the Company and are compensated on a
commission basis. The Company also expends resources in the areas of customer
service, product support and the maintenance of customer relationships. In
November 1996, the Company established an office in Calgary, Alberta, Canada
from which it leases and sells seismic equipment.
COMPETITION
Competition in seismic equipment leasing is fragmented, and the Company
is aware of several companies that engage in seismic equipment leasing. The
Company believes that its competitors, in general, do not have as extensive a
seismic equipment lease pool as does the Company. The Company also believes
that its competitors do not have similar exclusive lease referral agreements
with suppliers. Competition exists to a lesser extent from seismic data
acquisition firms that may lease equipment that is temporarily idle. Under the
I/O Agreement, I/O and its subsidiary, Global Charter Corporation, retain the
right to continue to (i) lease channel boxes in certain situations where the
Company and a prospective lessee cannot or do not enter into a lease, as more
fully described in the I/O Agreement, (ii) lease channel boxes with a purchase
option in North and South America and (iii) lease channel boxes outside of
North and South America. Global owns and operates a lease fleet of rental
seismic equipment, including 3-D channel boxes. Global leases seismic
equipment subject to purchase options and arranges the financing for such
leases. The Company does not believe those equipment leases compete with the
Company's seismic equipment leases, as the Company does not typically engage
in lease/purchase arrangements for I/O seismic equipment.
The Company competes for seismic equipment leases on the basis of (i)
price and delivery, (ii) availability of both peripheral seismic equipment and
complete data acquisition systems which may be configured to meet a customer's
particular needs and (iii) length of lease term. The Company competes in the
used equipment sales market with a broad base of seismic equipment owners,
including seismic service companies which use and eventually dispose of
seismic equipment, many of which have substantially greater financial
resources than the Company. The Company believes there is one competitor in
the used seismic equipment sales business that generates comparable revenues
from such sales, as well as numerous, smaller competitors who, in the
aggregate, generate significant revenue from such sales.
SUPPLIERS
The Company has several suppliers of seismic equipment for its lease
fleet. The Company currently acquires the majority of the 3-D channel boxes
for its lease fleet from I/O and Sercel and acquires the majority of its
vibrator control electronics from Pelton. The Company believes that I/O and
Sercel manufacture most of the land-based seismic systems and equipment in
use. Other suppliers of peripheral seismic equipment include OYO Geospace
Corporation (geophones, cables and seismic cameras), Charge-Air Compression
Systems (compressors), Steward Cable (cables), Trace Exploration (seismic
vibrators), Mark Products (geophones and cables) and Mertz, Inc. (seismic
vibrators). From time to time, the Company purchases new and used peripheral
seismic equipment from various other manufacturers. Management believes that
its current relationships with its suppliers are satisfactory.
EMPLOYEES
As of January 31, 1998, the Company had 33 employees, none of whom is
covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Twenty-seven employees are
involved in sales, management and administration and six work in field
operations. The Company considers its employee relations to be satisfactory.
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES
The Company owns its corporate office and warehouse facilities in
Huntsville, Texas. Its headquarters facility consists of 25,000 square feet
of office and warehouse space on approximately six acres. The Company also
leases approximately 10,000 square feet of office and warehouse space at its
facilities in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
10
On April 23, 1998, a class action lawsuit was filed against the Company and
its chief executive officer and chief financial officer in the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. The complaint,
styled Stanley Moskowitz V. Mitcham Industries, Inc., Billy F. Mitcham, Jr. and
Roberto Rios, alleges violations of Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
The complaint seeks class action status on behalf of those who purchased the
Company's common stock from June 4, 1997 through March 26, 1998 and damages in
an unspecified amount plus costs and attorney's fees. The complaint alleges
materially false and misleading misrepresentations and omissions in public
filings and announcements concerning the Company's business and its allowance
for doubtful accounts. The Company believes that the plaintiffs' allegations
are without merit and that there are meritorious defenses to the allegations,
and intends to defend the action vigorously.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
PART II
Item 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
MARKET INFORMATION FOR COMMON STOCK
The Common Stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol
"MIND." Prior to December 19, 1994, there was no public market for the Common
Stock. Prior to April 26, 1996, the Common Stock was traded on the Nasdaq
SmallCap Market.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low
bid prices of the Company's Common Stock as reported on the Nasdaq SmallCap
Market and the high and low sales prices as reported on the Nasdaq National
Market, as applicable, after April 26, 1996.
HIGH LOW
------ ------
Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 1997:
First Quarter 8 5 1/8
Second Quarter 8 5 3/4
Third Quarter 6 1/2 5 3/8
Fourth Quarter 9 7/8 5 7/8
Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 1998:
First Quarter 9 1/4 6 1/8
Second Quarter 15 3/8 6 5/8
Third Quarter 29 5/8 14 1/2
Fourth Quarter 33 1/8 12 5/8
Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 1999:
First Quarter 19 1/4 9 3/4
Second Quarter (through May 8, 1998) 13 1/8 10 3/4
On May 11, 1998, the last reported sale price for the Common Stock on the
Nasdaq National Market was $12 3/4. As of January 31, 1998, there were 92
shareholders of record of the Common Stock.
DIVIDEND POLICY
The Company has not paid any cash dividends on the Common Stock since its
inception, and the Board of Directors does not contemplate the payment of cash
dividends in the foreseeable future. It is the present policy of the Board of
Directors to retain earnings, if any, for use in developing and expanding the
Company's business. In addition, the Company's bank loan agreement restricts the
payment of dividends. In the future, payment of dividends by the Company will
also depend on the
11
Company's financial condition, results of operations and such other factors as
the Board of Directors may consider.
ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION
OVERVIEW
The Company leases and sells seismic equipment primarily to seismic data
acquisition companies and oil and gas companies conducting land and transition
zone seismic surveys worldwide. The Company provides short-term leasing of
seismic equipment to meet a customer's requirements and offers maintenance and
support during the lease term. All leases at January 31, 1998 were for a term
of one year or less. Seismic equipment held for lease is carried at cost, net
of accumulated depreciation.
For the years ended January 31, 1997 and 1998, revenues from foreign
customers totaled $6.8 million and $17.1 million, respectively. While most of
the Company's transactions with foreign customers are denominated in United
States dollars, some of the Company's transactions with Canadian customers are
denominated in Canadian dollars. The Company has not been subject to material
gains or losses resulting from currency fluctuations and has not engaged in
currency hedging activities.
SEASONALITY
Historically, seismic equipment leasing has been susceptible to weather
patterns in certain geographic regions. There is some seasonality to the
Company's lease revenues from customers operating in Canada, where a
significant percentage of the seismic survey activity occurs in the winter
months, from October through March. During the months in which the weather is
warmer, certain areas are not accessible to trucks, earth vibrators and other
heavy equipment because of the unstable terrain. This seasonal leasing
activity by the Company's Canadian customers has historically resulted in
increased lease revenues in the Company's first and fourth fiscal quarters.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998 COMPARED WITH FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31,
1997
Revenues for fiscal 1998 of $42.0 million represented an increase of
$27.3 million, or 186%, over fiscal 1997 revenues of $14.7 million. Short-term
leasing services generated revenues of $17.1 million for fiscal 1998, an
increase of $9.0 million, or 111%, as compared to $8.1 million for fiscal
1997. This increase reflected additions to the equipment lease pool throughout
fiscal 1998 to meet lease demand. Seismic equipment sales for fiscal 1998 were
$9.3 million, an increase of $6.5 million, or 231%, as compared to $2.8
million for fiscal 1997. The increase in sales was due primarily to customer
purchases of lease pool equipment at the end of the lease contract that were
not entered into originally as a lease/purchase contract. In fiscal 1998, the
Company's customers in several instances preferred to enter into a lease of
seismic equipment with an option to purchase at the end of the lease term.
Lease services from lease/purchase contracts generated revenues of $2.4
million for fiscal 1998, an increase of $1.0 million, or 76%, as compared to
$1.4 million for fiscal 1997, and sales from lease/purchase equipment
generated revenues of $12.8 million, an increase of $10.4 million or 435%, as
compared to $2.4 million for fiscal 1997. The increase in lease/purchase
revenues was due primarily to an increase in customer's demand for
lease/purchase option contracts. Sales commission revenues were $404,000 for
fiscal 1998. These revenues resulted from sales of equipment under the
Company's sales agreement with Sercel. There were no sales commission
revenues in fiscal 1997 primarily because the Company's Canadian offices were
not established until November 1996.
The Company's leasing revenues from both short-term leasing services and
lease/purchase contracts increased by $10.0 million. The Company's sublease
costs increased by $274,000, or 135%, and depreciation, which related primarily
to equipment available for lease, increased by $3.5 million, or 112%, due to the
increase in the equipment lease pool, resulting in an increase in net short-term
leasing revenues of $6.2 million.
Gross margins on sales of equipment under lease/purchase agreements were
5% and 20% for fiscal 1998 and 1997,
12
respectively. Gross margins decreased substantially in the fiscal year ended
January 31, 1998 because the Company sold primarily newer equipment when
customers exercised purchase options on leased equipment that had only
recently been purchased and added to the Company's equipment lease pool. In
fiscal 1997 there were fewer of these low margin transactions and the
equipment sold was older and more depreciated.
Gross margins on seismic equipment sales were 10% and 34% for fiscal 1998
and 1997, respectively. Gross margins decreased substantially in the fiscal
year ended January 31, 1998 because the Company sold primarily newer equipment
that had only recently been purchased and added to the Company's equipment
lease pool. In the same prior year period and in the past, the Company sold
primarily older, more fully depreciated equipment, yielding significantly
greater margins.
The Company's provision for doubtful accounts expense decreased from $1.3
million in fiscal 1997 to $842,000 in fiscal 1998. The decrease was a result
of no bankruptcy filings by any of the Company's customers in fiscal 1998 as
opposed to fiscal 1997 when one of the Company's customers, Grant Geophysical,
Inc. ("Grant") filed for bankruptcy. The provision for doubtful accounts
expense was 2% of total revenues in fiscal 1998 and 9% of total revenues in
fiscal 1997. As of January 31, 1998, the Company's allowance for doubtful
accounts was approximately $1.0 million.
The Company's effective income tax rate was approximately 38% for fiscal
1998 as compared to approximately 35% for fiscal 1997. The higher tax rate
was due to the Company's Canadian subsidiary which is subject to income
taxation in Canada where a higher tax rate is in effect.
Net income for fiscal 1998 was $6.4 million, which increased by $3.7
million, or 137% as compared to fiscal 1997.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of January 31, 1998, the Company had net working capital of
approximately $33.4 million and $15.0 million of availability under its bank
credit facilities. Net cash provided by operating activities for the year
ended January 31, 1998 decreased by $466,000, as compared to the same prior
year period, primarily as a result of an increase in trade accounts
receivable. At January 31, 1998, the Company had trade accounts receivable of
$3.9 million that were more than 90 days past due, with four customers owing
an aggregate of $1.5 million of such amount. As of January 31, 1998, the
Company's allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $1.0 million,
which management believes is sufficient to cover any losses in its trade
accounts receivable, including any losses in its international customers'
trade accounts.
Grant's plan of reorganization was approved by the bankruptcy court on
September 30, 1997. As of January 31, 1998, the Company had received payments
from Grant totaling $1.2 million, which represents final settlement on the
amounts owed the Company representing post-bankruptcy petition claims of
approximately $1.6 million. The Company's chief financial officer is a member
of the creditors committee. As a result of the chief financial officer's
discussions with the creditors legal counsel, the Company expects to collect
one-half of pre-bankruptcy petition claims, which total approximately
$755,000. All of the approximately $750,000 that will not be collected from
Grant has been written off. The Company is currently leasing seismic equipment
to Grant.
During March 1997, the Company completed a public offering of 3,450,000
shares of Common Stock, of which 2,875,000 shares were sold by the Company and
575,000 shares were sold by selling shareholders. The net proceeds to the
Company from the offering (after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions and expenses of the offering) were approximately $18.2 million.
The net proceeds were used to purchase additional 3-D seismic data acquisition
equipment, to pay outstanding debt to the Company's commercial lender under a
revolving line of credit and a term loan and for certain other purposes.
Prior to December 8, 1997, the Company had a $5.0 million line of credit
with Bank One, Texas, N.A. ("Bank One"). At January 31, 1998, the Company had
not drawn any amounts under that line of credit. As of December 8, 1997, the
Company replaced the previous line of credit with a working capital revolving
line of credit of up to $15 million from Bank One (the
13
"New Revolver"). Interest on advances under the New Revolver will be payable
monthly at a variable rate which is based upon either, at the Company's
option, LIBOR or Bank One's base lending rate. The LIBOR rate, if elected,
will range between LIBOR plus 1.75% and LIBOR plus 2.75% depending upon the
debt service coverage ratio the Company maintains. Similarly, the Bank One
base lending rate, if elected, will range between the base rate minus 0.25%
and the base rate plus 0.25%, again depending upon the Company's debt service
coverage ratio. Additionally, the Company will owe Bank One each fiscal
quarter a fee equal of 0.25% of the average daily unused portion of the New
Revolver calculated for the previous quarter. Advances will be limited to the
total of 80% of eligible accounts receivable and 50% of all eligible lease
pool equipment. The New Revolver contains restrictions, among others, on the
ability of the Company to incur indebtedness and pay dividends and requires
the Company to meet certain financial covenants, including a minimum tangible
net worth, a debt service coverage ratio, aging of accounts receivable and net
income. The New Revolver will expire on December 8, 1999, at which time the
unpaid principal amount of the New Revolver will be due and payable in full.
During December 1997, the Company completed a public offering of a total
of 1,920,000 shares of its common stock, of which 1,900,000 shares were sold
by the Company and 20,000 shares were sold by the selling shareholders. The
net proceeds to the Company from the offering (after deducting underwriting
discounts and expenses of the offering) were approximately $33.6 million. In
the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998, $18.3 million of the proceeds were used to
pay for lease pool equipment which was either leased or sold to customers.
As of January 31, 1998, capital expenditures for fiscal 1998 totaled
approximately $41.2 million. The Company has budgeted capital expenditures of
approximately $25 million for fiscal 1999. At January 31, 1998, the Company
had satisfied or exceeded the minimum purchase requirements under the I/O
Agreement, and had exceeded the minimum purchase requirements under its
Exclusive Equipment Lease Agreement with Sercel. Management believes that the
net proceeds of the December 1997 offering, cash provided by operations and
funds available from its commercial lender will be sufficient to fund its
operations and budgeted capital expenditures for fiscal 1999.
YEAR 2000. The Company has begun to address possible remedial efforts in
connection with computer software that could be affected by the Year 2000
problem. The Year 2000 problem is the result of computer programs being
written using two digits rather than four to define the applicable year. Any
programs that have time-sensitive software may recognize a date using "00" as
the year 1900 rather than the year 2000. This could result in a major system
failure or miscalculations. The Company has been informed by the suppliers of
substantially all of the Company's software that all of those suppliers'
software that is used by the Company is Year 2000 compliant. The software
from these suppliers is used in major areas of the Company's operations such
as for financial, sales, warehousing and administrative purposes. The Company
has no internally generated software. After reasonable investigation, the
Company has not yet identified any Year 2000 problem but will continue to
monitor the issue. However, there can be no assurances that Year 2000 problem
will not occur with respect to the Company's computer systems. The Year 2000
problem may impact other entities with which the Company transacts business,
and the Company cannot predict the effect of the Year 2000 problem on such
entities.
ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The information required by this item appears at pages F-1 through F-22
hereof and incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 8. CHANGES AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None
PART III
ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS;
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
14
Information regarding directors and executive officers of the Company
will be set forth in the proxy statement for the 1998 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders under the heading "Election of Directors," and is incorporated
herein by reference. Information regarding compliance by the officers,
directors and control persons of the Company with Section 16(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 will be set forth in the Company's proxy
statement for the 1998 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the heading "Other
Matters-Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act," and is
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information regarding executive compensation will be set forth in the
Company's proxy statement for the 1998 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under
the heading "Executive Compensation," and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and
management will be set forth in the Company's proxy statement for the 1998
Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the heading "Principal Holders of
Securities and Security Ownership of Management," and is incorporated herein
by reference.
ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions will
be set forth in the Company's proxy statement for the 1998 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders under the heading "Certain Transactions," and is incoporated
herein by reference.
Item 13. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT NUMBER
- --------------
3.1 -- Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Mitcham Industries,
Inc.(1) (Exhibit 3.1)
3.2 -- Amended and Restated Bylaws of Mitcham Industries, Inc. (1) (Exhibit
3.2)
4.1 -- Copy of Specimen stock certificate evidencing Common Stock of Mitcham
Industries, Inc.(2)(Exhibit 4.1)
9 -- Voting Agreement, dated September 20, 1993, between the Company, Billy
F. Mitcham, Jr. and certain shareholders (1) (Exhibit 9)
10.1 -- Exclusive Lease Referral Agreement, dated February 22, 1994, between
Mitcham Industries, Inc. and Input/Output, Inc., as amended. (3)
(Exhibit 10.1)
10.2 -- Fifth Amendment to Exclusive Lease Referral Agreement with
Input/Output, dated January 9, 1997 (7) (Exhibit 10.2)
10.3 -- Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 20, 1993, between the
Company and certain shareholders (1) (Exhibit 10.14)
10.4 -- Employment Agreement, dated January 15, 1997, between the Company and
Billy F. Mitcham, Jr. (7) Exhibit 10.4) **
10.5 -- Consulting Agreement, dated April 1, 1994, between the Company and
Billy F. Mitcham, Sr. (1) (Exhibit 10.16)
10.6 -- First Amendment to Consulting Agreement, dated January 15, 1997,
between the Company and Billy F. Mitcham, Jr. (7) (Exhibit 10.6)
10.7 -- Promissory Note, dated September 22, 1995, in the original principal
amount of $276,250, made payable by the Company to the order of First
National Bank of Huntsville (4) (Exhibit 10.26)
10.8 -- Deed of Trust, dated September 22, 1995, securing the $276,250 loan
(4) (Exhibit10.27)
10.9 -- Promissory Note, dated January 31, 1996, in the original principal
amount of $1,000,000 made payable by
15
the Company to the order of Bank One, Texas, National Association
("Bank One") (5) (Exhibit 10.8)
10.10 -- Promissory Note, dated January 31, 1996, in the original principal
amount of $4,206,000, made payable by the Company to the order of Bank
One Leasing Corporation ("Banc One Leasing") (5) (Exhibit 10.9)
10.11 -- Letter Loan Agreement, dated January 31, 1996, as amended, between the
Company, Bank One and Banc One Leasing Corporation (5) (Exhibit 10.10)
10.12 -- Assignment of Leases, dated January 31, 1996, between the Company,
Bank One and Banc One Leasing (5) (Exhibit 10.11)
10.13 -- Security Agreement, dated January 31, 1996, between the Company, Bank
One, and Banc One Leasing (5) (Exhibit 10.12)
10.14 -- Exclusive Lease Referral Agreement, dated May 14, 1996, between the
Company and Pelton Company, Inc. (6) (Exhibit 10.1)
10.15 -- Exclusive Equipment Lease Agreement, effective September 20, 1996,
between the Company and SERCEL, S.A. (6) (Exhibit 10.2)
10.16 -- Commercial Representation Agreement, effective September 20, 1996,
between Mitcham Canada LTD., an Alberta corporation, and Georex, Inc.
(6) (Exhibit 10.3)
10.17 -- First Amendment of Exclusive Lease Referral Agreement, dated January
1997, between the Company and Pelton. (7) (Exhibit 10.17)
10.18 -- 1994 Stock Option Plan of Mitcham Industries, Inc. (2) (Exhibit 10.9)
**
10.19 -- Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (2) (Exhibit 10.10)
10.20 -- Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (2) (Exhibit 10.11)
10.21 -- 1994 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan of Mitcham Industries,
Inc. (2) (Exhibit 10.12) **
10.22 -- Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (2) (Exhibit 10.13)
10.23 -- Form of Mitcham Industries, Inc. customer lease agreement (1) (Exhibit
10.20)
10.24 -- Letter Loan Agreement, dated January 16, 1997, between the Company and
BankOne (8) (Exhibit 10.24)
10.25 -- Assignment of Leases, dated January 16, 1997, between the Company and
Bank One (8) (Exhibit 10.25)
10.26 -- Security Agreement, dated January 16, 1997, between the Company and
Bank One (8) (Exhibit 10.26)
10.28 -- First Amendment to Letter Loan Agreement, dated January 16, 1997,
among the Company, Bank One and Bank One Leasing (8) (Exhibit 10.28)
21 -- Subsidiaries of the Company (6) (Exhibit 11)
23 -- Consent of Hein + Associates LLP *
27 -- Financial Data Schedule\*
- ---------------
* Filed herewith
** Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
(1) Incorporated by reference to the indicated exhibit number of the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 33-81164-D),
filed with the SEC on July 5, 1994.
(2) Incorporated by reference to the indicated exhibit number of the
Registrant's Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2,
filed with the SEC on November 9, 1994.
(3) Incorporated by reference to the indicated exhibit number of the
Registrant's Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2,
filed with the SEC on December 12, 1994.
(4) Incorporated by reference to the indicated exhibit number of the
Registrant's Post-Effective amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement
on Form SB-2, filed with the SEC on October 30, 1995.
(5) Incorporated by reference to the indicated exhibit number of the
Registrant's Post-Effective amendment No. 4 to its Registration Statement
on Form SB-2, filed with the SEC on April 17, 1996.
(6) Incorporated by reference to the indicated exhibit number of the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-10555), filed
with the SEC on October 30, 1996.
(7) Incorporated by reference to the indicated exhibit number of the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-19997), filed with the SEC
on January 17, 1997.
(8) Incorporated by reference to the indicated exhibit number of the Company's
Amendment No. 1 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the
SEC on January 31, 1997.
(b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
16
NONE
17
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report on Form 10-KSB to be signed on
its behalf the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of
Huntsville, State of Texas, on the 14th day of May 1998.
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
By: /s/ BILLY F. MITCHAM, JR.
---------------------------------
Billy F. Mitcham, Jr., Chairman of
the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer (principal
executive officer)
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934, THIS REPORT
ON FORM 10-KSB HAS BEEN SIGNED BELOW BY THE PERSONS IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON
THE DATE INDICATED.
SIGNATURE TITLE/CAPACITY DATE
--------- -------------- ----
/s/ BILLY F. MITCHAM, JR Chairman of the Board, May 14, 1998
- --------------------------- President and Chief
Billy F. Mitcham, Jr. Executive Officer
/s/ PAUL C. MITCHAM Vice President - May 14, 1998
- --------------------------- Operations and Director
Paul C. Mitcham
/s/ ROBERTO RIOS Vice President - May 14, 1998
- --------------------------- Finance, Secretary,
Roberto Rios Treasurer and Director
(principal financial
and accounting officer)
/s/ WILLIAM J. SHEPPARD Vice President - May 14, 1998
- --------------------------- International Operations
William J. Sheppard and Director
18
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
JANUARY 31, 1998
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-----------------------------
PAGE
----
Independent Auditor's Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of January 31, 1998. . . . . . . . . . F-3
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended
January 31, 1997 and 1998. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
for the Years ended January 31, 1997 and 1998. . . . . . . . . . . F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
January 31, 1997 and 1998. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-7
F-1
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Mitcham Industries, Inc.
Huntsville, Texas
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Mitcham
Industries, Inc. and Subsidiary as of January 31, 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended January 31, 1998.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Mitcham Industries, Inc. and
Subsidiary as of January 31, 1998, and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended January
31, 1998, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP
HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP
Houston, Texas
April 17, 1998
F-2
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 1998
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash $ 7,498,000
Marketable securities, at market 25,009,000
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $1,024,000 14,070,000
Installment trade receivables 444,000
Inventory 942,000
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 248,000
Income taxes receivable 211,000
-----------
Total current assets 48,422,000
Seismic equipment lease pool, net of accumulated depreciation 42,236,000
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation 898,000
Other assets 6,000
-----------
Total assets $91,562,000
-----------
-----------
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 8,400,000
Deferred income taxes payable 45,000
Deferred revenue 1,055,000
Accrued liabilities and other current liabilities 5,532,000
-----------
Total current liabilities 15,032,000
Deferred income taxes 2,294,000
-----------
Total liabilities 17,326,000
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized;
none issued and outstanding --
Common stock, $.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized;
9,425,759 shares, issued and outstanding 94,000
Additional paid-in capital 61,275,000
Retained earnings 12,770,000
Cumulative translation adjustment 97,000
-----------
Total shareholders' equity 74,236,000
-----------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $91,562,000
-----------
-----------
F-3
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31,
---------------------------
1997 1998
----------- -----------
Revenues:
Short-term leasing $ 8,106,000 $17,115,000
Lease/purchase activities:
Leasing revenues 1,387,000 2,435,000
Sales of equipment 2,388,000 12,770,000
Sales of seismic equipment 2,809,000 9,303,000
Sales commissions -- 404,000
----------- -----------
Total revenues 14,690,000 42,027,000
----------- -----------
Costs and expenses:
Seismic equipment subleases 203,000 477,000
Cost of sales:
Sales of seismic equipment under lease/purchase
agreements 1,918,000 12,163,000
Other sales of seismic equipment 1,865,000 8,334,000
Repairs, net 120,000 530,000
General and administrative 1,808,000 3,166,000
Provision for doubtful accounts 1,346,000 842,000
Depreciation 3,112,000 6,590,000
----------- -----------
Total costs and expenses 10,372,000 32,102,000
----------- -----------
Operating income 4,318,000 9,925,000
Other income (expense):
Interest, net (240,000) 340,000
Other, net 73,000 74,000
----------- -----------
Total other income (expense) (167,000) 414,000
----------- -----------
Income before income taxes 4,151,000 10,339,000
Provision for income taxes 1,449,000 3,947,000
----------- -----------
Net income $ 2,702,000 $ 6,392,000
----------- -----------
----------- -----------
Earnings per common share:
Basic $ 0.66 $ 0.87
Diluted $ 0.60 $ 0.83
----------- -----------
----------- -----------
Shares used in computing earnings per common share:
Basic 4,114,000 7,307,000
Diluted 4,526,000 7,686,000
----------- -----------
----------- -----------
F-4
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, 1997 AND 1998
COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL CUMULATIVE
--------------------- PAID-IN RETAINED TRANSLATION
SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL EARNINGS ADJUSTMENT TOTAL
--------- ------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Balances, January 31, 1996 3,221,000 $32,000 $ 4,340,000 $ 3,676,000 $ - $ 8,048,000
Issuance of common stock upon
exercise of warrants 1,254,000 13,000 4,479,000 - - 4,492,000
Net income - - - 2,702,000 - 2,702,000
--------- ------- ----------- ----------- ------- -----------
Balances, January 31, 1997 4,475,000 45,000 8,819,000 6,378,000 - 15,242,000
Issuance of common stock, net
of offering expenses 4,775,000 48,000 51,743,000 - - 51,791,000
Issuance of common stock upon
exercise of warrants and
options 176,000 1,000 713,000 - - 714,000
Cumulative translation
adjustment - - - - 97,000 97,000
Net income - - - 6,392,000 - 6,392,000
--------- ------- ----------- ----------- ------- -----------
Balances, January 31, 1998 9,426,000 $94,000 $61,275,000 $12,770,000 $97,000 $74,236,000
--------- ------- ----------- ----------- ------- -----------
--------- ------- ----------- ----------- ------- -----------
F-5
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31,
-----------------------------
1997 1998
------------ ------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 2,702,000 $ 6,392,000
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
Depreciation 3,112,000 6,590,000
Provision for doubtful accounts, net of chargeoffs 1,153,000 (476,000)
Deferred income taxes 652,000 792,000
Inventory (267,000) (469,000)
Trade accounts receivable (3,422,000) (9,299,000)
Federal income taxes, current (44,000) (478,000)
Accounts payable and other current liabilities 193,000 661,000
Other, net 141,000 41,000
------------ ------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 4,220,000 3,754,000
------------ ------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of seismic equipment held for lease (14,011,000) (34,511,000)
Purchases of property and equipment (231,000) (426,000)
Purchase of marketable securities -- (20,009,000)
Disposal of lease pool equipment 2,603,000 10,495,000
------------ ------------
Net cash used in investing activities (11,639,000) (44,451,000)
------------ ------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from short-term borrowings 1,000,000 --
Payments on short-term borrowings (401,000) (999,000)
Proceeds from long-term debt 3,126,000 --
Payments on long-term debt and capitalized lease obligations (1,134,000) (3,612,000)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock upon exercise of
warrants and options 4,492,000 714,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of offering
expenses -- 51,791,000
------------ ------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 7,083,000 47,894,000
------------ ------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash (336,000) 7,197,000
Cash, beginning of period 637,000 301,000
------------ ------------
Cash, end of period $ 301,000 $ 7,498,000
------------ ------------
------------ ------------
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid for:
Interest $ 385,000 $ 143,000
Taxes 865,000 3,526,000
------------ ------------
------------ ------------
Equipment purchases in accounts payable $ 1,468,000 $ 6,700,000
Purchase of marketable securities in accounts payable $ -- $ 5,000,000
------------ ------------
------------ ------------
F-6
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
ORGANIZATION -- Mitcham Industries, Inc. (the Company), is a Texas corporation
formed on January 29, 1987. The Company and its wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary
provide full-service equipment leasing, sales and services to the seismic
industry worldwide, primarily in North and South America.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary. All intercompany transactions
and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
DESCRIPTION OF LEASING ARRANGEMENTS -- The Company leases various types of
seismic equipment to seismic data acquisition companies. All leases at January
31, 1998 are for one year or less. Lease revenue is recognized ratably over the
term of the lease.
EQUIPMENT SOLD ON THE INSTALLMENT BASIS -- The Company periodically sells
seismic equipment on an installment basis. The terms of the sale agreements
generally require twelve payments, with two payments due upon delivery of the
equipment and the remaining payments due over the succeeding ten months. To the
extent a down payment equal to at least 16.5% of the sales price is not
received, the gross profit from the sale is deferred until sufficient payments
have been received to warrant full revenue recognition.
LEASE/PURCHASE ACTIVITIES -- The Company periodically leases equipment to
customers allowing them the option to purchase the equipment, at a pre-
determined price, any time during the lease term. The Company allows its
customers to credit a portion of the monthly lease payments to the purchase
price. Monthly lease revenue is recognized over the term of the lease until the
election to purchase is exercised, at which time the Company records the sale.
Lease revenue is deferred to the extent that the estimated net book value, at
the end of the lease term, exceeds the adjusted purchase price.
MARKETABLE SECURITIES -- Marketable securities to be held to maturity are stated
at amortized cost. Marketable securities classified as available-for-sale are
stated at market value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate
component of shareholders' equity, net of deferred income taxes. If a decline in
market value is determined to be other than temporary, any such loss is charged
to earnings. Trading securities are stated at fair value, with unrealized gains
and losses recognized in earnings. The Company records the purchases and sales
of marketable securities and records realized gains and losses on the trade
date. Realized gains or losses on the sale of securities are recognized on the
specific identification method.
As of January 31, 1998, approximately $18,000,000 was invested in preferred
stocks and the balance in government securities. Also, as of January 31, 1998,
the securities were classified as available-for-sale and market was approximated
by cost.
F-7
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INVENTORIES -- Inventories consist primarily of used seismic equipment purchased
in bulk liquidation sales. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market
using the average cost method.
SEISMIC EQUIPMENT HELD FOR LEASE -- Seismic equipment held for lease consists
primarily of remote signal conditioners (channel boxes) and peripheral equipment
and is carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is
computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
equipment, which is seven years for channel boxes and three to seven years for
other peripheral equipment.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT -- Property and equipment is carried at cost, net of
accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives of the property and equipment. The estimated
useful lives of equipment range from three to seven years. Buildings are
depreciated over 40 years and property improvements over 10 years.
INCOME TAXES -- The Company files a separate federal return for its subsidiary
in Canada. The Company accounts for its taxes under the liability method,
whereby the Company recognizes on a current and long-term basis, deferred tax
assets and liabilities which represent differences between the financial and
income tax reporting bases of its assets and liabilities. Historically the
Company has paid income taxes on the cash basis of accounting. Beginning in
fiscal 1998, the Company no longer is eligible to report on the cash basis of
accounting for federal income tax reporting purposes.
CASH EQUIVALENTS -- For purposes of presenting cash flows, the Company considers
all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less
to be cash equivalents.
USE OF ESTIMATES -- The preparation of the Company's financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires the Company's
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in
these financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ
from these estimates.
INDUSTRY CONCENTRATION -- The Company's revenues are derived from seismic
equipment leased and sold to companies providing seismic acquisition services.
The seismic industry has rapidly expanded its 3-D seismic acquisition
capabilities over the past few years as this technology has gained broader
market acceptance from oil and gas exploration companies. With this expansion,
many of the seismic acquisition companies in North America, while experiencing
rapid growth in 3-D seismic acquisition revenues, have not experienced
corresponding increases in profitability and have become increasingly leveraged.
Should the financial performance of the companies in this industry not improve,
the Company could be exposed to additional credit risk and be subjected to
declining demand for its leasing services.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS -- The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued Statement of Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 121 entitled IMPAIRMENT OF
LONG-LIVED ASSETS. SFAS No. 121, which became effective beginning February 1,
1996, provides that in the event that facts
F-8
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
and circumstances indicate that the cost of operating assets or other assets
may be impaired, an evaluation of recoverability would be performed. If an
evaluation is required, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows
associated with the asset would be compared to the carrying amount of the
asset to determine if a writedown to market value or discounted cash flow is
required. SFAS No. 121 did not have a material impact on its operating results
or financial condition of the Company upon implementation.
The FASB also issued SFAS No. 123, ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK BASED COMPENSATION,
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1995. This statement
allows companies to choose to adopt the statement's new rules for accounting for
employee stock-based compensation plans. For those companies which choose not to
adopt the new rules, the statement requires disclosures as to what earnings per
share would have been if the new rules had been adopted. Management adopted the
disclosure requirements of this statement during fiscal 1997. See Note 10 for
further discussion.
EARNINGS PER SHARE -- The Company adopted SFAS No. 128, -Earnings Per Share
(EPS), which was issued in February 1997, and which requires presentation of
both basic and diluted EPS on the face of the income statement for all periods
presented. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income available to common
shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS is computed using the
weighted-average number of common and potential common shares outstanding during
the period. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is
used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the
exercise of stock options. All prior years' data in this report have been
restated to reflect the requirements of SFAS No. 128.
The FASB also issued SFAS No. 130, REPORTING COMPREHENSIVE INCOME and SFAS No.
131, DISCLOSURES ABOUT SEGMENTS OF AN ENTERPRISE AND RELATED INFORMATION. SFAS
No. 130 establishes standards for reporting and display of comprehensive income,
its components and accumulated balances. Comprehensive income is defined to
include all changes in equity except those resulting from investments by owners
and distributions to owners. Among other disclosures, SFAS No. 130 requires that
all items that are required to be recognized under current accounting standards
as components of comprehensive income be reported in a financial statement that
displays with the same prominence as other financial statements. SFAS No. 131
supersedes SFAS No. 14, FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR SEGMENTS OF A BUSINESS
ENTERPRISE. SFAS No. 131 establishes standards on the way that public companies
report financial information about operating segments in annual financial
statements and requires reporting of selected information about operating
segments in interim financial statements issued to the public. It also
establishes standards for disclosures regarding products and services,
geographic areas and major customers. SFAS No. 131 defines operating segments as
components of a company about which separate financial information is available
that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding
how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.
F-9
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SFAS Nos. 130 and 131 are effective for financial statements for periods
beginning after December 15, 1997 and require comparative information for
earlier years to be restated. Because of the recent issuance of these standards,
management has been unable to fully evaluate the impact, if any, the standards
may have on the future financial statement disclosures. Results of operations
and financial position, however, will be unaffected by implementation of these
standards.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION -- All balance sheet accounts of the Canadian
subsidiary have been translated at the current exchange rate as of the end of
the accounting period. Income statement items have been translated at average
currency exchange rates. The resulting translation adjustment is recorded as a
separate component of shareholders' equity.
RECLASSIFICATIONS -- Certain 1997 balances have been reclassified to conform
with 1998 presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income.
2. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consisted of the following as of:
JANUARY 31,
1998
----------
Land $ 25,000
Building and improvements 392,000
Furniture and fixtures 628,000
Autos and trucks 122,000
----------
1,167,000
Less accumulated depreciation (269,000)
----------
$ 898,000
----------
----------
F-10
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
3. NOTES PAYABLE TO BANK
On December 8, 1997, the Company replaced the previous line of credit with a
working capital revolving line of credit of up to $15 million from Bank One (the
"New Revolver"). Interest on advances under the New Revolver will be payable
monthly at a variable rate which is based upon either, at the Company's option,
LIBOR or Bank One's base lending rate. The LIBOR rate, if elected, will range
between LIBOR plus 1.75% and LIBOR plus 2.75% depending upon the debt service
coverage ratio the Company maintains. Similarly, the Bank One base lending rate,
if elected, will range between the base rate minus 0.25% and the base rate plus
0.25%, again depending upon the Company's debt service coverage ratio.
Additionally, the Company will owe Bank One each fiscal quarter a fee equal of
0.25% of the average daily unused portion of the New Revolver calculated for the
previous quarter. Advances will be limited to the total of 80% of eligible
accounts receivable and 50% of all eligible lease pool equipment. The New
Revolver contains restrictions, among others, on the ability of the Company to
incur indebtedness and pay dividends and requires the Company to meet certain
financial covenants, including a minimum tangible net worth, a debt service
coverage ratio, aging of accounts receivable and net income. The New Revolver
will expire on December 8, 1999, at which time the unpaid principal amount of
the New Revolver will be due and payable in full. The Company's subsidiary,
Mitcham Canada Ltd., has guaranteed full repayment of the New Revolver. No
amounts were outstanding under this credit arrangement as of January 31, 1998.
4. LEASES
The Company leases and subleases seismic equipment to customers under operating
leases with non-cancelable terms of one year or less. These leases are
generally renewable on a month-to-month basis. All taxes (other than U.S.
federal income taxes) and assessments are the contractual responsibility of the
lessee. To the extent the foreign taxes are not paid by the lessee, the
relevant foreign taxing authorities might seek to collect such taxes from the
Company. Under the terms of its lease agreements, any amounts paid by the
Company to such foreign taxing authorities may be billed and collected from the
lessee. If the Company is unable to collect the foreign taxes it paid on behalf
of its lessees, the Company may have foreign tax credits in the amounts paid
which could be applied against its U.S. income tax liability subject to certain
limitations. The Company is not aware of any foreign tax obligations as of
January 31, 1998 that have not already been reflected on the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.
The Company leases seismic equipment from others under month-to-month operating
leases. Lease expense incurred by the Company in connection with such leases
amounted to $203,000 and $477,000 for the years ended January 31, 1997 and 1998,
respectively.
F-11
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Equipment held for lease to others consisted of the following as of:
JANUARY 31,
1998
-----------
Remote signal conditioners
(channel boxes) $25,912,000
Other peripheral equipment 23,915,000
Less: accumulated depreciation (7,591,000)
-----------
$42,236,000
-----------
-----------
5. INCOME TAXES
The components of income tax expense were as follows:
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31,
------------------------
1997 1998
---------- ----------
Current:
Federal $775,000 $2,417,000
Foreign -- 670,000
State 22,000 68,000
---------- ----------
797,000 3,155,000
Deferred 652,000 792,000
---------- ----------
$1,449,000 $3,947,000
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
The components of the Company's deferred tax liability consisted of the
following as of:
JANUARY 31,
1998
-----------
Deferred tax asset - allowance for doubtful accounts $ 369,000
Deferred tax liabilities:
Tax accounting change from cash basis to accrual basis (1,242,000)
Depreciation (1,466,000)
-----------
Deferred tax liability, net $(2,339,000)
-----------
-----------
F-12
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following is a reconciliation of expected to actual income tax expense:
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31
---------------------------
1997 1998
---------- ----------
Federal income tax expense at 34% $1,411,000 $3,515,000
State and foreign taxes 26,000 277,000
Nondeductible expenses 12,000 47,000
108,000
----------
Other -
---------- ----------
$1,449,000 $3,947,000
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
6. SALES AND MAJOR CUSTOMERS
A summary of the Company's revenues from foreign customers by geographic region
is as follows:
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31,
----------------------------
1997 1998
---------- -----------
Canada $3,287,000 $8,064,000
UK/Europe 1,657,000 4,172,000
Mexico 174,000 940,000
South America 1,271,000 2,842,000
Asia 393,000 919,000
Other 4,000 160,000
---------- -----------
Totals $6,786,000 $17,097,000
---------- -----------
---------- -----------
Three customers represented approximately 15%, 14% and 12%, respectively, of
fiscal 1997 total revenues and two customers represented approximately 20% and
17%, respectively, of fiscal 1998 total revenues. No other customer exceeded 10%
of revenues for fiscal 1997 and 1998.
7. CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK
As of January 31, 1997 and 1998, amounts due from customers which exceeded 10%
of accounts receivable amounted to an aggregate of $1.7 million from two
customers, and $6.5 million from two different customers, respectively.
One of the Company's significant customers filed for bankruptcy protection
during December 1996. Revenues derived from this customer amounted to 15% of
total revenues for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1997. As of that date,
amounts due from this customer totaled approximately $1.2 million. As of January
31, 1997, the Company's allowance for doubtful accounts was $1.5 million, of
which approximately $850,000 of that balance was intended to fully reserve all
amounts due from
F-13
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
this customer, and the remaining $650,000 of the balance was intended to
provide for any potential loss associated with the Company's remaining trade
accounts receivable. Through January 31, 1998, the Company received payments
from this customer totaling $1.2 million, which represented final settlement
on the amounts owed the Company representing post-bankruptcy petition claims
of approximately $1.6 million. The Company expects to collect one-half of
pre-bankruptcy petition claims, which are approximately $755,000 as of January
31, 1998. All of the approximately $750,000 that will not be collected from
this customer has been written off. The Company's allowance for doubtful
accounts balance at January 31, 1998 is approximately $1,024,000, which
represents approximately $370,000 increase from the $650,000 balance from
January 31, 1997 (exclusive of amounts specifically reserved for this bankrupt
customer).
The Company maintains deposits with banks which exceed the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insured limit and has a money market account
included in its cash balances which is not FDIC insured. Management believes the
risk of loss in connection with these accounts is minimal.
8. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
The Company has 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized, none of which
are outstanding as of January 31, 1998. The preferred stock may be issued in
multiple series with various terms, as authorized by the Company's Board of
Directors. The Company has 20,000,000 shares of common stock authorized, of
which 9,425,759 are issued and outstanding as of January 31, 1998. Warrants to
acquire 892,750 shares of the Company's common stock at $3.50 per share issued
in connection with the Company's 1995 initial public offering were exercised
during fiscal 1997. During March and December 1997, the Company consummated
public offerings of its common stock, as more fully discussed in Note 12, in
which it sold to underwriters an aggregate of 4,775,000 shares of common stock.
The Company issued warrants to various shareholders during fiscal 1995 to
acquire 49,500 shares of the Company's common stock at $5.00 per share. The
number of shares and exercise price of the warrants were adjusted to 63,953 and
$3.87, respectively, during fiscal 1996 as a result of the anti-dilution
provisions of the warrants. Of these warrants, 49,113 remained unexercised at
January 31, 1998.
In July 1995, the Company issued warrants to acquire 35,000 shares of its common
stock to a public relations firm engaged by the Company. The warrants are
exercisable at $3.50 per share for a period of five years from their issuance
and 15,000 remain unexercised at January 31, 1998.
In January 1995, the Company issued warrants to acquire 85,000 units (consisting
of two shares of common stock and one warrant to purchase one share of common
stock at $4.20 per share) at $7.97 per unit to underwriters in connection with
the Company's initial public offering. The securities underlying these warrants,
as well as the common stock underlying currently outstanding warrants,
F-14
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
are subject to certain piggy-back registration rights. As of January 31,
1998, all of these warrants have been exercised.
In August 1996, in exchange for services, the Company issued warrants to its
legal counsel to purchase 50,000 shares of its common stock for $6.43 per share,
exercisable for a period of four years from issuance. Of this amount, warrants
to acquire 40,000 shares are unexercised at January 31, 1998. In December 1996,
in exchange for services, the Company issued warrants to its legal counsel to
purchase 50,000 shares of its common stock at $9.28 per share, exercisable
beginning December 14, 1997 for a period of four years from their issuance. In
October 1997, in exchange for services rendered in connection with the Company's
secondary offering, the Company issued warrants to its legal counsel to purchase
25,000 shares of its common stock for $28.12 per share, exercisable beginning
October 28, 1998 for a period of four years from their issuance.
Warrants to acquire 200,000 shares of the Company's common stock were issued to
underwriters in connection with the Company's secondary offering in March 1997.
The warrants are exercisable at $8.40 per share for a period of two years from
their issuance and are unexercised at January 31, 1998.
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
EQUIPMENT PURCHASES -- On February 22, 1994, the Company executed an agreement
with Input/Output, Inc. (I/O) under which I/O will notify the Company of any
inquiries it receives to lease I/O's channel boxes and other peripheral
equipment in North and South America and will allow the Company the opportunity
to provide such leasing. In the event the Company and a prospective customer are
unable to reach agreement on such leases in a 72-hour period, I/O shall have the
right to offer the equipment for lease to the prospective customer. Effective
June 1, 1996, the Company entered into an agreement with I/O to amend the terms
of and extend the Exclusive Lease Referral Agreement through May 31, 2000. Under
the I/O Agreement as amended, the Company must purchase an aggregate of $13.25
million of I/O equipment as follows: $3.0 million of I/O equipment between June
1 and November 30, 1996 (the "Renewal purchase"), with a minimum of $1.5 million
to be purchased by August 31, 1996. Thereafter, from January 1, 1997 through May
31, 1997, the Company must purchase at least an aggregate of $1.25 million of
I/O equipment. In each of the years from June 1, 1997 through May 31, 1997, June
1 through May 31, 1999 and June 1, 1999 through May 31, 2000, the Company must
purchase at least an aggregate of $3.0 million of I/O equipment (of an aggregate
additional $10.25 million after the $3.0 million Renewal Purchase is made). As
of January 31, 1998, the Company believes it has fulfilled the terms of the
agreement, including the minimum purchase commitments through such date.
In September 1996, the Company entered into two agreements with the Sercel
subsidiaries of Compagnie Generale de Geophysique ("Sercel"). One agreement, the
Exclusive Equipment Lease Agreement provides that until December 31, 1999, the
Company will be Sercel's short-term leasing representative throughout the world
and that Sercel will refer to the Company all requests it receives
F-15
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
from its customers to lease its 3-D data acquisition equipment and other field
equipment. The second agreement, the Commercial Representation Agreement,
provides that until September 19, 1999, subject to certain termination after
September 19, 1998, the Company will be Sercel's exclusive sales agent in
Canada. In connection with entering into this agreement, the Company
established an office in Calgary, Alberta, Canada in November 1996. As of
January 31, 1998, the Company believes it has fulfilled the terms of the
agreement, including the minimum purchase commitments.
These agreements are subject to termination under certain circumstances
including, among others, non-payment of amounts due, insolvency of the Company,
and the current President of the Company no longer being employed.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT -- Effective January 15, 1997, the Company entered into an
employment agreement with the Company's President for a term of five years,
beginning January 15, 1997, which term is automatically extended for successive
one-year periods unless either party gives written notice of termination at
least 30 days prior to the end of the current term. The agreement provides for
an annual salary of $150,000, subject to increase by the Board of Directors. It
may be terminated prior to the end of the initial term or any extension thereof
if the President dies; if it is determined that the President has become
disabled; if the Board of Directors determines that the President has breached
the employment agreement in any material respect, has appropriated a material
business opportunity of the Company or has engaged in fraud or dishonesty with
respect to the Company's business that is punishable by imprisonment. If the
President's employment is terminated by the Company prior to the end of the
initial five-year term other than for a reason enumerated above, the President
will be entitled to payments equal to $450,000, payable ratably over the 24
months following such termination. For a period of two years after the
termination of the agreement, the President is prohibited from engaging in any
business activities that are competitive with the Company's business and from
diverting any of the Company's customers to a competitor.
CONSULTING AGREEMENTS -- The Company has a contract with the father of the
Company's President to provide sales consulting services. The agreement calls
for payments of $5,500 per month through April 1999, subject to earlier
termination on the occurrence of certain events.
STOCK OPTION PLANS
The Company has a stock option plan under which options to purchase a maximum of
400,000 shares of common stock may be issued to officers, employee directors,
key employees and consultants of the Company. The stock option plan provides
both for the grant of options intended to qualify as "incentive stock options"
under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), as well as
options that do not so qualify.
Activity in the 1994 Stock Option Plan and Director Plan (as defined below), for
the years ended January 31, 1997 and 1998 was as follows:
F-16
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Number of Price
Shares Per Share
--------- ---------
Outstanding, January 31, 1996 251,250 $ 4.54
Exercised -- --
Granted 43,500 5.87
Expired (1,000) --
------- ------
Outstanding, January 31, 1997 293,750 4.73
Exercised (89,120) 4.68
Granted 67,750 21.52
Expired (500) 3.29
------- ------
Outstanding, January 31, 1998 271,880 $ 8.91
------- ------
------- ------
As of January 31, 1998, options to acquire 204,130 shares of the Company's
common stock were fully vested and exercisable at a weighted average exercise
price of $4.73 per share. The remaining options which have a weighted average
exercise price of $21.52 per share, will vest in fiscal 1999.
If not previously exercised, options outstanding at January 31, 1998, will
expire as follows: 39,880 options expire on May 9, 1999; 9,000 options expire on
August 14, 2001; 67,250 options expire on May 9, 2004; 1,000 options expire on
March 16, 2005; 2,000 options expire on June 8, 2005; 51,000 options expire on
December 4, 2005; 3,000 options expire on June 12, 2006; 31,000 options expire
on August 14, 2006; 3,000 options expire on June 11, 2007; and 64,750 expire on
October 3, 2007.
With respect to incentive stock options, no option may be granted more than ten
years after the effective date of the stock option plan or exercised more than
ten years after the date of grant (five years if the optionee owns more than 10%
of the common stock of the Company at the date of grant). Additionally, with
regard to incentive stock options, the exercise price of the option may not be
less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock at the date of grant
(110% if the optionee owns more than 10% of the common stock of the Company).
Subject to certain limited exceptions, options may not be exercised unless, at
the time of exercise, the optionee is in the service of the Company. As of
January 31, 1998, options to purchase an aggregate of 262,880 shares of common
stock are issued and outstanding under the 1994 Stock Option Plan, 107,130 of
which are exercisable at a price of $5.00 per share, 51,000 of which are
exercisable at $3.29 per share, 39,000 of which are exercisable at $5.75 per
share, 1,000 of which are exercisable at $6.00 per share and 64,750 of which are
exercisable at $22.00 per share.
The Company has a non-employee director stock option plan (the Director Plan)
which provides for the grant of options that do not qualify as "incentive stock
options" under the Code. Options granted under the Director Plan must have an
exercise price at least equal to the fair market value of the Company's common
stock on the date of grant. Pursuant to the Director Plan, options to purchase
F-17
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1,000 shares of common stock are granted to each non-employee director upon his
election to the Board and every year thereafter so long as he is re-elected to
the Board of Directors. Options granted under the Director Plan are fully vested
one year after their grant and expire ten years after the date of the grant. As
of January 31, 1998 options to purchase an aggregate of 9,000 shares of common
stock are issued and outstanding under the Director Plan, 1,000 of which are
exercisable at $2.88 per share, 2,000 of which are exercisable at $3.13 per
share, 3,000 of which are exercisable at $5.75 per share and 3,000 of which are
exercisable at $11.13 per share.
The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and related Interpretations in accounting for its plans. Accordingly,
no compensation cost has been recognized for its stock option plans. Had
compensation expense for the Company's stock-based compensation plans been
determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under those
plans, consistent with the method of SFAS No. 123, the Company's net income and
income per common share would have been decreased to the pro forma amounts
indicated below:
Years Ended January 31,
---------------------------
1997 1998
---------- ----------
Net income
As reported $2,702,000 $6,392,000
Pro forma 2,443,000 6,011,000
Net income per common share (basic)
As reported $ .66 $ .87
Pro forma .59 .82
The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions; risk free
rates of 5.4% to 7%; volatility of 48.4% and 59% for 1997 and 1998,
respectively; no assumed dividend yield; and expected lives of five to ten
years.
11. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company's financial instruments consist of trade receivables and payables
and notes payable to banks. The Company believes the carrying value of these
financial instruments approximate their estimated fair value.
12. PUBLIC OFFERINGS OF COMMON STOCK
During March 1997, the Company completed a public offering of a total of
3,450,00 shares of its common stock, of which 2,875,000 shares were sold by the
Company and 575,000 shares were sold by the selling shareholders. The net
proceeds to the Company from the offering (after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated expenses of the offering) were
approximately $18.2 million.
F-18
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
During December 1997, the Company completed a public offering of a total of
1,920,000 shares of its common stock of which 1,900,000 shares were sold by the
Company and 20,000 shares were sold by selling shareholders. The net proceeds to
the Company from the offering (after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated expenses of the offering) were approximately $33.6
million.
SUBSEQUENT EVENT (unaudited)
On April 23, 1998 the Company was named in a shareholder lawsuit. The suit was
filed in the U.S. District Court in Texas seeking class action status for anyone
who acquired the Company's common stock during the period June 4, 1997 through
March 26, 1998. The class action complaint purports to present claims under the
federal securities laws and seeks unspecified damages based on alleged
misleading disclosures during the class period between June 1997 and March 1998.
The Company believes the lawsuit does not have merit and will defend this
position vigorously.
F-19
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Mitcham Industries, Inc.
Huntsville, Texas
We have audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
consolidated financial statements of Mitcham Industries, Inc. and Subsidiary
included in this Registration Statement and have issued our report thereon
dated April 17, 1998. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an
opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The financial
statement schedule listed in Item 16(b) herein (Schedule II--Valuation and
Qualifying Accounts) is the responsibility of the Company's management and is
presented for purpose of complying with the Securities and Exchange
Commission's rules and is not part of the basic financial statements. The
financial statement schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures
applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion,
is fairly stated in all material respects with the financial data required to
be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.
/s/ HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP
Hein + Associates LLP
Houston, Texas
April 17, 1998
F-20
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SCHEDULE II
MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
COL. A COL. B COL. C(1) COL. D COL. E
- --------------------- ------------------- -------------------- ----------------- -------------
BALANCE AT ADDITIONS CHARGED TO DEDUCTIONS BALANCE AT
DESCRIPTION BEGINNING OF PERIOD COSTS AND EXPENSES DESCRIBE END OF PERIOD
- --------------------- ------------------- -------------------- ----------------- -------------
January 31, 1997
Allowance for
doubtful accounts $ 347,000 $1,346,000 $ 193,000(A) $1,500,000
January 31, 1998
Allowance for
doubtful accounts $1,500,000 $ 842,000 $1,318,000(A)(B) $1,024,000
- -----------------------
(A) Represents recoveries and uncollectible accounts written off.
(B) Includes approximately $850,000 reserved in fiscal 1997 that was
written off in fiscal 1998.
Note: Column C(2) has been omitted, as all answers would be "none.
F-21
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-11097) on Form S-8 of Mitcham Industries, Inc. of our report dated April
17, 1998, relating to the balance sheets of Mitcham Industries, Inc., as of
January 31, 1998, and the related statements of income, changes in
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the years ended January 31, 1997 and
1998, which report appears in the January 31, 1998 annual report on Form
10-KSB of Mitcham Industries, Inc.
/s/ HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP
HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Houston, Texas
May 15, 1998
5
1,000
12-MOS
JAN-31-1998
NOV-01-1998
JAN-31-1998
7,498
25,009
15,538
1,024
942
48,422
50,994
7,860
91,562
15,032
0
0
0
94
74,139
91,562
22,477
42,027
20,497
20,974
9,756
842
143
10,339
3,947
6,392
0
0
0
6,392
.87
.83
5
1,000
3-MOS 6-MOS 9-MOS
JAN-31-1997 JAN-31-1997 JAN-31-1997
FEB-01-1996 MAY-01-1996 AUG-01-1996
APR-30-1996 JUL-31-1996 OCT-31-1996
3,912 8,281 3,330
0 0 0
3,519 3,920 3,975
487 512 615
360 825 630
7,372 10,577 7,423
11,309 12,006 19,266
2,084 2,624 3,489
16,657 20,015 23,252
2,992 3,102 5,961
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
36 44 44
9,938 13,118 13,692
16,657 20,015 23,252
466 1,398 2,007
2,270 4,344 7,363
373 894 1,261
1,452 1,005 1,372
29 2,017 3,568
487 153 418
66 191 289
789 1,363 2,472
284 490 854
505 873 1,618
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
505 873 1,618
.15 .23 .40
.13 .20 .37
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.
5
3-MOS 9-MOS
JAN-31-1998 JAN-31-1998
JAN-31-1997 FEB-01-1997
APR-30-1997 OCT-31-1997
12,670 3,819
0 0
8,482 15,151
1,700 891
436 1,527
20,075 19,876
24,082 45,324
5,119 7,092
38,881 58,108
3,367 17,897
0 0
0 0
0 0
74 75
34,958 38,879
39,095 58,108
1,420 15,391
5,536 26,292
981 12,666
1,023 17,532
1,805 2,189
289 709
17 207
2,620 7,389
897 2,503
1,723 4,886
0 0
0 0
0 0
1,723 4,886
.28 .70
.28 .67
5
1,000
3-MOS 9-MOS
JAN-31-1998 JAN-31-1998
JAN-31-1997 FEB-01-1997
APR-30-1997 OCT-31-1997
12,670 3,819
0 0
8,482 15,151
1,700 891
436 1,527
20,075 19,876
24,082 45,324
5,119 7,092
38,881 58,108
3,367 17,897
0 0
0 0
0 0
74 75
34,958 38,879
39,095 58,108
1,420 15,391
5,536 26,292
981 12,666
1,023 17,532
1,805 2,189
289 709
17 207
2,620 7,389
897 2,503
1,723 4,886
0 0
0 0
0 0
1,723 4,886
.28 .70
.28 .67
